Buy on Amazon
€79.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - $72.05 vs $120.9
- Up to 33% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 7 5700G - $0.58 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-7300 - 154 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
139
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.98
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-7300 4GHz Skylake CPU LGA1151 Desktop Smart Cache Boxed
Buy for €79.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €134.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 5700G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.