Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7300 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7300 is 1051 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Athlon 3000G - 165 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $72.05 vs $72.2
- Up to 4% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Athlon 3000G - $0.48 vs $0.5 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
161
97.57575757575758%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
96%
Price, €
€80.14
99%
Buy for €80.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
75.95238095238095%
Multi-Core
1975
78.93685051958434%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |