Buy on Amazon
€39.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 167 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.