Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 34% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $37.73 vs $57.05
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.41 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100T - 103 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
102
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13871 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
67%
Price, €
€63.32
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |