Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 197 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 0% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 226 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $54.84 vs $169.73
- Up to 68% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.27 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2538 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
225
99.5575221238938%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
32.142857142857146%
Price, €
€188.4
32%
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |