Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $35.17 vs $318.06
- Up to 88% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900F - $0.29 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7100T - 148 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
133
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
12%
Price, €
€353.05
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |