Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1301 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $54.84 vs $197.42
- Up to 71% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10850K - $0.35 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i3-7100T - 182 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
95.6043956043956%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
29.166666666666668%
Price, €
€219.14
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
64.13793103448275%
Multi-Core
2260
24.84608619173263%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |