Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2186 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i7-2600K - 54 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $54.84 vs $57.77
- Up to 17% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-2600K - $1.13 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1565 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
47
87.03703703703704%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
83.08823529411762%
Price, €
€64.12
94%
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |