Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1311 days older than the more expensive Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-4670 - $0.27 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-7100T - 231 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $43.86 vs $54.84
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
229
99.13419913419914%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
79%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
55.102040816326536%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
95.22184300341297%
Multi-Core
2260
70.01239157372986%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |