Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Core i3-7100T - 779 vs 745 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $79.69 vs $106.11
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-7100T - $0.11 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €117.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
779
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |