Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 68% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1820 - 84 vs 50 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $28.95 vs $54.84
- Up to 11% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-7100T - $0.64 vs $0.72 per FPS
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
88.8888888888889%
Price, €
€60.87
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
50
59.523809523809526%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
43.99641577060932%
Multi-Core
825
36.50442477876106%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |