Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $54.84 vs $171.83
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i3-7100T - 137 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
95.05962521294718%
Multi-Core
2260
32.396788990825684%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |