Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than FX-8300 - $54.84 vs $77.55
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - $0.48 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3691 minutes ago
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |