Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - 102 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than FX-6350 - $54.84 vs $73.11
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - $0.6 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
91
89.2156862745098%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
67.41573033707866%
Price, €
€81.15
75%
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |