Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 855 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5820K - 184 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $29.24 vs $314.37
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |