Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 240 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $51.18 vs $80.42
- Up to 36% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.47 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13369 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
63%
Price, €
€89.27
63%
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13369 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |