Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1697 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-6320 - 418 vs 409 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13999 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |