Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 953 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 12% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G2130 - 252 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Pentium G2130 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2130 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2130
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $31.91 vs $49.74
- Up to 27% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-6300 - $0.16 vs $0.22 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
72.72727272727273%
Price, €
€55.21
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4103 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
226
89.68253968253968%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Single-Core
539
42.70998415213946%
Multi-Core
926
36.47105159511619%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G2130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |