Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 2184 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $49.75 vs $72.35
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for €80.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
35.34072900158478%
Multi-Core
1463
57.621110673493504%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |