Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 365 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-5820K - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $49.74 vs $314.37
- Up to 84% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-5820K - $0.25 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1570 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
222
99.55156950672645%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
15.92356687898089%
Price, €
€348.95
15%
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |