Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $67.01 vs $84.81
- Up to 9% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11400F - $0.67 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 15% better in New World than Core i3-6300 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
111
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
90%
Price, €
€94.14
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |