Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Celeron G4900 - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $39.15 vs $49.74
- Up to 16% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-6300 - $0.26 vs $0.31 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
83.87096774193549%
Price, €
€55.21
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3747 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
169
96.02272727272727%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
48.811410459587954%
Multi-Core
1051
41.394249704608114%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |