Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 37% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3930T - 96 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $28.52 vs $49.75
- Up to 22% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i3-6300 - $0.45 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
77.58620689655173%
Price, €
€55.22
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €55.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
70
72.91666666666666%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
43.42313787638668%
Multi-Core
948
37.33753446238677%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |