Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $67.67 vs $150.5
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.18 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-6300 - 426 vs 408 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
408
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for €167.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |