Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $73.12 vs $146.23
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-14400F - $0.15 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - 680 vs 532 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
532
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
680
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
62%
Price, €
€162.31
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |