Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4130 - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $30.07 vs $73.12
- Up to 59% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-6100 - $0.25 vs $0.61 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
132
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |