Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 164 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $27.05 vs $73.12
- Up to 59% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-6100 - $0.2 vs $0.49 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |