Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
97.82244556113902%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |