Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $73.12 vs $109.68
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.64 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-6100 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |