Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 3054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $43.86 vs $210.59
- Up to 72% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KF - $0.11 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-560 - 594 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
443
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12052 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
28%
Price, €
€233.75
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €233.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |