Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3532 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $43.86 vs $186.45
- Up to 74% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.19 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i3-560 - 281 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
251
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
25%
Price, €
€206.96
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |