Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3532 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $43.86 vs $202.25
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900 - $0.21 vs $0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-560 - 246 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
229
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Buy for €224.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |