Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4167 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $43.86 vs $62.14
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-12100F - $0.29 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-560 - 205 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 58 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
167
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
85%
Price, €
€68.97
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |