Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $43.86 vs $164.51
- Up to 27% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900F - $2.21 vs $3.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 173% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-540 - 60 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13727 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
72%
Price, €
€182.61
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13727 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |