Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 3288 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $43.86 vs $109.68
- Up to 57% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-9600KF - $0.26 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i3-540 - 204 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
189
92.64705882352942%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
43.333333333333336%
Price, €
€121.75
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
25.708884688090738%
Multi-Core
841
14.736288768179428%
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |