Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $43.86 vs $138.2
- Up to 48% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11600K - $1.13 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than Core i3-540 - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
43
60.56338028169014%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
52.3148148148148%
Price, €
€153.4
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |