Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $43.86 vs $59.66
- Up to 13% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-10105F - $0.4 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 18% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-540 - 143 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
121
84.61538461538461%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
86.95652173913044%
Price, €
€66.22
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
28.060522696011002%
Multi-Core
841
18.805903398926656%
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |