Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5114 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $29.25 vs $381.43
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-530 - 223 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €32.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76701 minutes ago
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76700 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |