Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4745 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $32.9 vs $318.06
- Up to 88% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900F - $0.25 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-530 - 167 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
11%
Price, €
€353.05
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |