Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $32.9 vs $321.73
- Up to 89% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900K - $0.22 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-530 - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5869 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
11%
Price, €
€357.12
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €357.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |