Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3854 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $29.25 vs $190.11
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10850K - $0.29 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-530 - 137 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
113
82.48175182481752%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62189 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
18.831168831168828%
Price, €
€211.02
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |