Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $32.9 vs $51.18
- Up to 33% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - $0.18 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i3-530 - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |