Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2772 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $32.9 vs $196.68
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.19 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-530 - 201 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
17%
Price, €
€218.32
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |