Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 643 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8150 - $29.25 vs $59.97
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-530 - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €32.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75067 minutes ago
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |