Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $35.46 vs $131.6
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.21 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4370 - 204 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
184
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
29%
Price, €
€146.08
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |