Buy on Amazon
€94.14
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2110 days newer than Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4370 - 594 vs 535 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
72.3606168446026%
Multi-Core
2407
35.29843085496407%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.