Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $35.46 vs $102.37
- Up to 65% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10600 - $0.25 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4370 - 160 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
157
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
35%
Price, €
€113.63
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |