Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $109.59 vs $109.68
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-4360 - 237 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-4360 - $0.51 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 12 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
222
93.67088607594937%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
92.72727272727272%
Price, €
€121.65
100%
Buy for €121.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1170
53.278688524590166%
Multi-Core
2318
26.622257953370855%
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |