Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $37.73 vs $215.7
- Up to 80% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900KF - $0.36 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4350 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13930 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
20%
Price, €
€239.43
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |