Buy on Amazon
€39.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 427 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $35.17 vs $50.69
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-6400 - $0.32 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4350 - 126 vs 122 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
122
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4350 Processor (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz) BX80646I34350
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Intel Boxed Core I5-6400 FC-LGA14C 2.70 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56400
Buy for €56.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.